Aarvian / Telecom Operator
›
Network Quality Agent
Network Quality Agent — Phase 2 · Priority 1

Where the network is leaking revenue

Composite FOM (Availability × CSSR × DCR × Throughput) computed across 1684 BTS sites. Surfaces poor and over-utilised cells, projects FOM lift from capex, and recommends the highest-ROI investments.

Total BTS sites
1,684
Poor BTS
230 · 13.7%
Over-utilised
92 · 5.5%
Avg FOM (national)
80.9
FOM Distribution
57 English zones by health
Excellent (90+)
6
Good (70-89)
44
Poor (<70)
7
Region Network Health
Average FOM, ranked
40557085100South WestSouth EastEast MidlandsEast of EnglandNorth EastNorth WestWest MidlandsYorkshire & HumberLondon
Network Capex Scenario
FOM lift & revenue impact
£12M
2M · maintain12M · current proposal30M · accelerate
Projected national FOM
90.2/100
10.2
Poor BTS reduction
50 cells
50.0
Annual revenue recovered
£40.8M
+40.8
Highest Network Impact
Poor BTS × subscriber value
01
Birmingham
West Midlands · FOM 82
23
Poor BTS
Defend
02
Leeds
Yorkshire & Humber · FOM 75.2
8
Poor BTS
Defend
03
Sheffield
Yorkshire & Humber · FOM 88.7
8
Poor BTS
Maintain
04
Bradford
Yorkshire & Humber · FOM 90.5
10
Poor BTS
Maintain
05
Manchester
North West · FOM 87
6
Poor BTS
Maintain
06
Liverpool
North West · FOM 85.6
6
Poor BTS
Maintain
07
Coventry
West Midlands · FOM 88.1
6
Poor BTS
Maintain
08
Wandsworth
London · FOM 84.9
5
Poor BTS
Defend
09
Bolton
North West · FOM 90.6
7
Poor BTS
Maintain
10
Newham
London · FOM 90
4
Poor BTS
Maintain
11
Southwark
London · FOM 93.8
4
Poor BTS
Maintain
12
Stockport
North West · FOM 82.7
6
Poor BTS
Defend
Over-utilised Cells
Capacity expansion priority
01
Birmingham
West Midlands · FOM 82
9
OU BTS
Defend
02
Newham
London · FOM 90
8
OU BTS
Maintain
03
Croydon
London · FOM 86.7
8
OU BTS
Maintain
04
Camden
London · FOM 92.7
4
OU BTS
Maintain
05
Southwark
London · FOM 93.8
4
OU BTS
Maintain
06
Liverpool
North West · FOM 85.6
4
OU BTS
Maintain
07
Tower Hamlets
London · FOM 87.6
3
OU BTS
Maintain
08
Wandsworth
London · FOM 84.9
3
OU BTS
Defend